El órgano del placer es la inteligencia.
The organ of pleasure is the intellect.
(Nicolás Gómez Dávila, Escolios a un Texto Implícito, 2.84)
-
. The POTIS Project
I. Curculio: An Online Journal
II. My Other Sites and Pages
III. My Old Texts
IV. Favorite Sites
V. Blogroll
VI. Other Links
Recent Comments
- BAMBOS NEOPHYTOU on Callimachus on Heraclitus
- Raphael Soares on Artemis a Model for Widows?
- Raphael Soares on Artemis a Model for Widows?
- Leonardo de Arrizabalaga y Prado on “Government by Clowns”?
- Philological Crocodile on Should an OCT Have a Table of Contents?
Thank you for providing some of the better scholia of Gomez Davila, some of his other writings he is a reactionary Catholic.
Donne, in a youthful exercise, discourses on the nose as the organ of love.
NGD may have been a fine philosopher for all I know, but to call “intelligence” an “organ” is about as strange in Spanish as in English. Granted, there are less common acceptions, as in “party organ” for a political party’s newspaper, but organs usually have an element of the concrete. The rhetorical point of using the word órgano at all is that it sets up the expectation of a physical organ and then puts in an unexpected organ. Spanish-speakers do this all the time, but most do it correctly, by saying that “el órgano del placer es el cerebro” vel sim.
Possibly — I wouldn’t know — NGD’s odd usage reflects familiarity with the
original Greek sense of organ as `tool.’